Hi, we’d like to add a “core20” track to o3de to support users wishing to use core20 bases. The current latest/stable and latest/beta will be based on core22 going forward.
Happy to answer and questions/concerns about this. Thanks!
Hi, we’d like to add a “core20” track to o3de to support users wishing to use core20 bases. The current latest/stable and latest/beta will be based on core22 going forward.
Happy to answer and questions/concerns about this. Thanks!
Hello,
Per Process for aliases, auto-connections and tracks 2, we need a 1-week voting/discussion period before creating a new track, so I’ll check back on the discussion and votes in a few days.
I have a couple of questions before casting my vote.
o3de
’s release cadence, how often is a new major version (potentially requiring a new track) released? is this documented somewhere by upstream?Thanks,
Odysseus
Generally twice a year. This is defined by the sig-release team: sig-release/releases/Process/Major Release Process.md at main · o3de/sig-release · GitHub
We don’t have support explicitly defined, but we do support older versions with hotfixes and security updates on a rolling window when needed (generally around 1-2 releases). For instance, we issued a hotfix for 23.05.0 when there was an issue between pyyaml and cython. In addition, we are in the process of defining a LTS version to have more explicit commitment.
Hi,
Thanks for the response.
+1 from me as a reviewer. The core20
track has now been created.
Thanks,
Odysseus