Ros-snapd: ros-snapd-support

RoboticsCommunity · November 27, 2025, 10:00am

name: ros-snapd
description: This snap contains a ROS noetic node that exposes ROS services which allow interacting with snap services.
snapcraft: https://github.com/canonical/ros_snapd/blob/noetic/snap/snapcraft.yaml
upstream: https://github.com/canonical/ros_snapd/blob/noetic/snap/snapcraft.yaml
upstream-relation: We are the upstream maintainer of the project and the snap
interfaces:
- ros-snapd-support:
  - request-type: installation and auto-connection
  - reasoning: This interface was designed for this specific snap.

This request is the same as the one already approved for the ros2-snap, but for the ROS (1) version.

store-requests-bot · November 27, 2025, 10:00am

This request has been added to the queue for review by the @reviewers team.

jslarraz · November 28, 2025, 2:43pm

I think the request makes sense for the same reasons already discussed in Ros2-snapd: ros-snapd-support and snap-refresh-observe. +1 from me (#voteFor)

elisehdy · December 6, 2025, 12:23am

This is a +1(#voteFor) from me as well to allow auto-connection for the ros-snapd-support interface given the previous discussion and decision. Thanks!

store-requests-bot · December 11, 2025, 2:53pm

Voting period has ended. This request is approved with 2 votes for and 0 votes against.

jslarraz · December 12, 2025, 11:56am

The request was approved. Please upload a new revision declaring this interface to the store so that we can effectively grant it!

RoboticsCommunity · December 16, 2025, 3:25pm

I have just uploaded the ros-snapd and it still needs a manual review:

human review required due to 'allow-installation' constraint (bool) declaration-snap-v2_plugs_installation (ros-snapd, ros-snapd-support)

jslarraz · December 17, 2025, 11:18am

it still needs a manual review:

Yes, it was expected. As I said, we can “only” make the change effective once you upload a version that makes automatic review to fail.

This is now live