I understand that strict confinement is generally preferred over classic.
I’ve tried the existing interfaces to make the snap to work under strict confinement.
This request has been added to the queue for review by the @reviewers team.
Hello @lvce-editor!
The snap is a good candidate for classic confinement (#approve). I will begin publisher vetting!
Hey @lvce-editor
I agree that technical reasons are clear and lvce-editor fits in the supported IDEs category.
However, classic confinement is a sensitive matter and the snap/publisher vetting is devoted to guarantee that it is only granted to mature, well-known applications published by mature, well-known entities. As of today, I believe that lvce-editor doesn’t meet this criteria because of the following reasons:
- The projects seems to have little/none community around according to upstream repository (contributors, issues, PRs, etc.)
- I could not find evidences that the project has a strong user base currently
Thus, considering these factors, I think lvce-editor should not get classic confinement as of now.
