I’d like to pose some questions about the suitability of packaging certain types of software as snaps. Its not clear that they fit nicely into the snap architecture as I understand it. Maybe I just misunderstand it.
Its not:
snapcraft - or is that really “snap development” by another name - it would fit there if that’s what it means
well, it is definitely not snapd unless snapd misses a feature to package said software and you want it added … by your description it is also unlikely to be store related…
i would use the snapcraft category if you want the developers of snapcraft to be involved in the conversation or if you are missing a particular feature in snapcraft … otherwise i guess the snap category, being somewhat generic, is the best fit for conceptual discussions…
