dpb
July 26, 2017, 8:30pm
1
dpb@helo:~[]$ simplenote
cannot stat /var/lib/snapd/seccomp/bpf: No such file or directory
Note, this takes about 2-3 minutes to actually timeout and error.
dpb@helo:~[]$ snap version
snap 2.26.14
snapd 2.25
series 16
ubuntu 16.04
kernel 4.4.0-79-generic
dpb@helo:~[]$ snap list
Name Version Rev Developer Notes
canonical-livepatch 7 22 canonical -
conjure-up 2.2.2 561 canonical classic
core 16-2.26.14 2462 canonical -
documentation-builder 1.4.3 34 canonicalwebteam -
git-ubuntu 0 101 nacc classic
htop 2.0.2 68 maxiberta -
simplenote 1.0.8 2 snapcrafters -
telegram-latest 1.0.5 4 pain7 -
ubuntu-image 1.1+snap3 73 canonical classic
Any ideas?
Thank you for reporting the issue.
At first sight the discrepancy between snap and snapd versions feels like a potential issue.
Can you paste some more data? env | grep SNAP_
please
I see this in your logs Jul 26 08:52:27 helo /usr/lib/snapd/snapd[17216]: cmd.go:59: DEBUG: re-exec disabled by user
, did you set SNAP_REEXEC=0 in your environment by any chance? What is your version of snapd the debian package (apt-cache policy snapd
)?
dpb
July 26, 2017, 8:38pm
5
Right now, I’m here: but I’m doing an apt-get dist-upgrade
right now as I have some stale packages on the system. And no, I don’t know of any SNAP_REEXEC=0, but let me check through the usual places. It doesn’t sounds like something I would have set.
dpb@helo:~[]$ apt-cache policy snapd
snapd:
Installed: 2.25
Candidate: 2.25
Version table:
*** 2.25 500
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
2.0.2 500
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 Packages
Oh, interesting. We don’t test updated from 2.0.2 to stable snap. I’ll try to update our test suite to do that too.
This is interesting because we fixed one of the bugs exactly like this and this is why we made 2.26.14 release after the .13 one
dpb
July 26, 2017, 10:47pm
8
Oh interesting. So, I’m fully up to date on 16.04 now, and I even rebooted for good measure, and I’m still getting the same issue. Something else I can try?
Oh, that’s more interesting (in a bad way) than before.
Can you attach your journalctl -u snapd
output with the new snapd around? And please add snap version
again if you can.
dpb
July 27, 2017, 5:27pm
10
Thanks for looking zyga,
dpb@helo:ubuntu-advantage-script[(master)]$ journalctl -u snapd | pastebinit
http://paste.ubuntu.com/25185061/
dpb@helo:ubuntu-advantage-script[(master)]$ snap version
snap 2.26.14
snapd 2.25
series 16
ubuntu 16.04
kernel 4.4.0-87-generic
dpb
July 27, 2017, 5:28pm
11
I’m guessing this is the problem?
Jul 26 16:31:40 helo /usr/lib/snapd/snapd[3561]: helpers.go:206: cannot connect plug "network-bind" from snap "core", no such plug
No, the message is a red herring. It’s harmless.
This is the real problem: Jul 26 16:31:39 helo /usr/lib/snapd/snapd[3561]: cmd.go:59: DEBUG: re-exec disabled by user
I think that if you systemctl restart snapd.service
your problem will go away. Can you give that a try?
dpb
July 27, 2017, 7:26pm
15
Still getting that re-exec disabled by user
after issuing the systemctl restart snapd.service
.
with sudo ps -efx
I can see this:
2170 ? Ssl 0:00 /usr/lib/snapd/snapd LANG=en_US.UTF-8 PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/games LISTEN_PID=2170 LISTEN_FDS=2 LISTEN_FDNAMES=snapd.socket:snapd.socket SNAP_REEXEC=0
dpb
July 27, 2017, 7:31pm
16
ANNND, that worked. /etc/systemd/system/snapd.service.d/override.conf
contained the smoking gun (SNAP_REEXEC=0
).
Removing that line fixed things.
My guess is that was there from some debugging that I was doing, not sure.
Thanks!
1 Like