New interfaces needed for plasma-desktop-session

store-requests privileged-interfaces
20

Hey,

  • I just looked again to the declaration history and I could not find any evidence that it is was granted.
  • If for some reason an unexpected interface name is found the declaration (as it would be the case for systemd-user-control) automatic review immediately exits with the Unexpected output from snap-review. snap-review. I see it is not the case for any of the snap revisions.
  • Finally, according to @cav comment in the original thread, it seems that the suggested solution was also to update the base declaration on your side. Commentaries in the original topic suggest that @cav only manually approved the revision (in the same way I did for the latest one) and I could not find any commentary that indicates that the declaration was granted in the store side at all

I might be missing something, but everything points out that it was never granted tbh.