OK so - the bad news is that I’m still concerned about creating in advance tracks which may end up changing, so I would prefer if you requested track names as needed once the release dates approach. I’m happy to be overruled by other architects/reviewers on this, however.
The GOOD news is - As discussed in Simplified track request process for snaps with predictable cadence and since Go “has existing tracks and the new request conforms to the previous ones”, I’m now able to create these tracks, waiving the waiting period and the need for one extra vote based on the above rationale.
Your 1.10 track is ready (just for the go snap, is that correct?), and once you request 1.11 and beyond I’ll be able to process them quickly.
Cheers!
- Daniel