@niemeyer, per Process for reviewing classic confinement snaps, classic reviews are primarily handled by the snap advocacy team.
I agree this snap is a candidate for classic on technical terms and we’ve sufficiently captured why it is required, but I don’t see where the advocacy team has vetted the publisher. As architect, if you feel the publisher is sufficiently vetted, please say so and I’ll grant the declaration. Otherwise, @evan, @Wimpress or @popey: can one of you work with the publisher following the agreed to process (does not necessarily have to happen in the forum) and communicate back in this topic that you’ve vetted the publisher? At this point, I’ll be happy to grant the snap declaration.